387
5,455 100%
No names in the comment section, keep it to yourself/for yourselves (neither ask for names). Thanks!
il y a 7 ans
,jpeg/025/245/932/v2/320x180.210.jpg)
,jpeg/025/029/341/1280x720.17242093.jpg)
,jpeg/025/178/680/v2/320x180.237.jpg)
,jpeg/025/076/455/v2/320x180.271.jpg)
,jpeg/025/120/682/1280x720.17255188.jpg)
,jpeg/025/037/773/1280x720.17242460.jpg)
,jpeg/025/172/883/v2/320x180.264.jpg)
,jpeg/025/157/935/v2/320x180.204.jpg)
,jpeg/025/215/662/1280x720.17265965.jpg)
,jpeg/022/751/062/v2/320x180.280.jpg)
,jpeg/024/821/775/1280x720.17192447.jpg)
Commentaires
3
Connecte-toi ou inscris-toi pour publier des commentaires
lovebigbeauties il y a 7 ans
@D5th
1) Why are you not giving credit to the original content creators? Is it really so hard to do?
2) If your purpose was to create a backup copy of the original video without the creators knowing it, why did you choose to post a lower quality video?
It doesn't make sense to me. Why pollute the site with a lower quality video while the original is still here in a better quality?
Just in case you're wondering - here's the original in HD quality:
https://xhamster.com/movies/6118210/amateur_sucks_cock_in_a_public_park.html
https://xhamster.com/movies/6118340/sexy_amateur_cocksucker_in_public_park.html
1) Why are you not giving credit to the original content creators? Is it really so hard to do?
2) If your purpose was to create a backup copy of the original video without the creators knowing it, why did you choose to post a lower quality video?
It doesn't make sense to me. Why pollute the site with a lower quality video while the original is still here in a better quality?
Just in case you're wondering - here's the original in HD quality:
https://xhamster.com/movies/6118210/amateur_sucks_cock_in_a_public_park.html
https://xhamster.com/movies/6118340/sexy_amateur_cocksucker_in_public_park.html
Répondre
